, for the sole purposes strictly necessary for the distribution of the application in the client software. In addition to the doctrine of implied exhaustion, the distributor may include patent licenses with software. Also, in ProCD v. Zeidenberg, the license was declared enforceable because it was necessary for the customer to accept the terms of the agreement by clicking a “I agree” button to install the software. However, in Specht v. Netscape Communications Corp., the licensee was able to download and install the software without having to review the terms of the agreement and approve it positively, so that the license is considered unenforceable. I also just tried to completely remove the package, but the terminal says that, due to the incorrect package, I should reinstall the package before it is deleted.